Sunday 21 May 2023

A Groundbreaking Study Validates Human Impact Across Earth's Atmosphere

 A groundbreaking study has recently validated the predictions of climate-change models by establishing their agreement with real-world observations of Earth's atmosphere, extending up to an altitude of 50 km. This research focuses on a crucial "fingerprint" of human-driven climate change, whereby the lower part of the atmosphere experiences warming as carbon dioxide levels increase, while the upper part undergoes cooling. While not unexpected to experts, these findings provide further confirmation that human activities are the main drivers of climate change and furnish detailed information to refine future models.


In order for Earth to sustain life, atmospheric gases like carbon dioxide and water vapor play a vital role in raising its black-body temperature by trapping infrared radiation, akin to the effect of greenhouse glass. Concerns about the potential enhancement of this greenhouse effect through carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels were initially raised by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. However, it was in 1967 that Syukuro Manabe, who shared the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on modeling global warming, utilized an early computer model to make concrete predictions regarding the impact of rising carbon dioxide levels.

Manabe's notable paper, acknowledged by the Nobel Prize committee, explored the consequence of doubling carbon dioxide levels from 150 to 300 to 600 parts per million. The findings revealed a peculiar phenomenon: the lower atmosphere, known as the troposphere, experienced warming, while the upper atmosphere, known as the stratosphere, underwent cooling. Benjamin Santer, affiliated with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and the University of California, Los Angeles, explained that this discrepancy is primarily due to most of the carbon dioxide remaining in the troposphere, resulting in Earth radiating less heat into the stratosphere. Over centuries, the temperature of the upper stratosphere would ultimately equilibrate with the warmer troposphere.

Initial data obtained from weather balloons and more recent observations from satellites demonstrated warming in the troposphere and limited cooling in the lower stratosphere above approximately 16 km. However, since most weather balloons burst above 25 km and early satellite datasets exhibited divergences, comparing models and observations above 25 km proved challenging. Manabe had predicted that the cooling effect would be most pronounced in this region. Nonetheless, improved agreement has now been achieved.

In this new study, Santer and a global team of colleagues compared satellite observations from three different groups spanning the years 1986 to 2022 with state-of-the-art computational climate models. They employed a "vertical fingerprinting" technique developed by Klaus Hasselmann, one of the co-recipients of the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics and the founding director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Germany. This technique enabled them to determine whether the observed data provided clear evidence of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions or if alternative explanations were plausible.

The inclusion of higher-altitude data significantly boosted the signal-to-noise ratio, approximately five times higher than previous studies, offering incontrovertible evidence of anthropogenic climate change. While the observed effects appeared slightly smaller than current computer models predict, even after accounting for the average warming trend, a statistically significant signal was detectable from the temperature difference between the two atmospheric layers. The research findings have been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

While the results of this study are not surprising to Keith Shine from the University of Reading in the UK, who suggests that recent models, particularly those utilized in this study, exhibit better overall performance, they reinforce the existing literature. Shine recommends future investigations focusing on separating the contributions of different greenhouse gases, as not all available models treat them individually.

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous26 July

    Climate change is real for sure, sad!

    ReplyDelete

Subject: We Value Your Feedback!

Message:
Dear Visitor, please take a moment to share your feedback